CLICK HERE TO SEND AN EMAIL TO HARRY HURLEY

Harry Hurley

"Local and Independent Source for News"

 

 

Voters can say "no" to paying old debts

By SETH GROSSMAN • October 29, 2008
  • The first public question on Tuesday's ballot is a fraud. Supporters of this "bipartisan" amendment to our state constitution say it will stop the state from going deeper into debt. But it would do just the opposite.
This issue began in the 1830s. Then, as now, state governments borrowed heavily to support bad business deals for people with good political connections. When the deals failed, payments on the bonds stopped. Banks around the country failed during the "panic of 1837."

 

In 1844, New Jersey and people in most states rewrote state constitutions so this never could happen again. With New Jersey's new constitution, state government could not have total debt of more than 1 percent of our yearly budget ($33 million) without a vote of the people.
So far, New Jersey voters approved $3 billion in state debt. But Gov. Corzine's charts during his highway monetization hearings showed the state is almost $40 billion in debt, with more than $3 billion paid on that debt every year.
What happened?

 

For the past 25 years, Republicans and Democrats — with help from Wall Street — created a loophole to borrow $29 billion without voter approval. They created "shell corporations," such as the Economic Development Authority. These corporations then borrowed billions from Wall Street lenders even though they had no way to pay that money back. That is because the state Legislature promised to pay the debts of these authorities.

 

When former Bogota Mayor Steve Lonegan sued to close this loophole in 2000, the New Jersey Supreme Court narrowly agreed to permit it. In a 4-to-3 decision, it ruled voter approval was not needed, because promises the state made to pay these debts were unenforceable and could be broken at any time.
So, why did Wall Street loan $29 billion in return for a promise that could be legally broken at any time? Because Wall Street's biggest insurance companies insured the debt. Until six months ago, they made huge profits by betting our state government would pay billions of dollars it did not legally have to pay for the next 30 years. Now those companies need bailouts.

 

In June, Corzine and the Legislature made another unenforceable promise — to pay for $3.9 billion more of the Economic Development Authority's junk debt without voter approval. But now, nobody on Wall Street will buy or insure these bonds. Wall Street knows fed-up voters now may demand that their legislators refuse to pay billions of dollars we do not legally have to pay.
The problem of runaway debt by independent authorities such as this has fixed itself. So, why do Sen. Ray Lesniak, D-Union, and Sen. Leonard Lance, R-Hunterdon, and others want to fix a problem that no longer exists?
The answer is in the fine print of Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 39, which will replace our current constitution if Question No. 1 is approved.
First, voter approval will not be needed if a proposed project has "an independent nonstate source of revenue" or "a source of revenue otherwise required to be appropriated pursuant to another provision of this Constitution." Any Enron accountant or Abbott lawyer can drive a truck through those loopholes.

 

But here is the real kicker: "No voter approval shall be required . . . authorizing the creation of . . . debts . . . for the refinancing of all or a portion of any outstanding debts or liabilities of . . . an autonomous public corporate entity."
The state Supreme Court ruled that New Jersey voters don't have to pay a dime on any of the $29 billion previously borrowed by shell entities unless they vote to do it. But with a "Yes" vote on Question No. 1, Corzine and the Legislature could pass a simple law to refinance every dollar of the $37 billion borrowed by state authorities without voter approval. Then, every unenforceable contract to pay $3 billion a year will become enforceable for the first time for the next 30 years.
Once the full faith and credit of New Jersey is pledged, all state sales tax money is earmarked to pay that debt before it is spent on anything else. And if that money is not enough, the state is legally obligated to adopt a new statewide property tax to pay the difference.

 

Don't be fooled. Vote "No" on Question No. 1.
Seth Grossman, a Somers Point attorney who represents Lonegan, is a former Atlantic City councilman and Atlantic County freeholder. He is acting president of www.libertyandprosperity.org.
 



  

 

 

 

 

 

Back to HarryHurley.info

 

 

HARRYHURLEY.COM IS THE CITY HALL INSIDERS CHOICE FOR NEWS
HAVE NEWS OR INFORMATION FOR HARRY HURLEY: CLICK HERE
THANK YOU FOR VISITING OUR PRESENCE ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB

Webmaster services for HarryHurley.info provided by Repair N Click IT,NJ

"HURLEY IN THE MORNING" THE TRUTH IN BROADCASTING  •  HARRYHURLEY.COM "MORNING, NOON AND NIGHT"
WHERE CITY HALL INSIDERS GO TO READ THE REAL NEWS
The "Local and Independent" Source for Exclusive Breaking News
©
2008 • Harry Hurley • "Hurley in the Morning"HarryHurley.comHarryHurley.net • HarryHurley.info • All Rights Reserved